scite

scite

4.7 (2,392 reviews)

AI Assistant , Productivity

A specialized research engine that classifies academic citations as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning to help users verify scientific claims and avoid retracted data.

Best for researchers who need to validate the reliability of specific findings, weaker for broad literature synthesis compared to Elicit.

Analysis based on product data, pricing structure, traffic signals, and public user sentiment.

Who Should Use scite?

Typical users

PhD students, medical researchers, and academic librarians who need to vet the credibility of peer-reviewed papers.

Maturity fit

beginner to advanced

Choose this if…

  • You need to know if a specific study has been replicated or refuted by later research
  • Your priority is verifying claims rather than just finding relevant PDFs
  • You want an AI assistant that provides direct quotes from full-text papers as evidence

Skip this if…

  • You are researching humanities or arts where citation classification is less accurate
  • You need a free tool for casual browsing without a subscription commitment
  • Your primary goal is automated data extraction from tables and figures

About scite

scite is a citation analysis platform built to move beyond simple citation counts. It uses machine learning to analyze the context of over 1.2 billion citation statements, telling you exactly how one paper discusses another.

What it actually does

The platform provides 'Smart Citations' that categorize references as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning. It includes an AI assistant for natural language queries and a reference check tool that scans manuscripts for retracted or highly contested sources.

What makes it different

Unlike Google Scholar or Semantic Scholar, scite indexes the actual sentences where a paper is cited. This allows it to classify the relationship between papers, making it possible to see the 'scientific debate' around a claim without reading every citing article manually.

Smart Citation classification (Supporting/Contrasting/Mentioning) AI-powered research assistant grounded in full-text papers Automated Reference Check for manuscript verification Citation alerts for specific authors or papers Visual citation network mapping Zotero, Mendeley, and browser extension integrations Patent and grant citation tracking

Ratings across the web

4.7 (2,392 reviews)
G2 2,384 reviews
Open on G2
4.7/5
Capterra 5 reviews
Open on Capterra
4.2/5
Trustpilot 3 reviews
Open on Trustpilot
4.8/5

Ratings aggregated from independent review platforms.

Key Features

Smart Citations

Displays the exact snippet of text where a paper is cited to provide immediate context.

Reference Check

Uploads your draft to ensure you aren't citing retracted work or ignoring major contradictions.

scite Assistant

A chatbot that answers questions using only its database of 180M+ papers to minimize hallucinations.

Citation Statement Search

Allows searching for specific claims across billions of extracted citation sentences.

Journal Dashboards

Aggregates citation metrics at the journal level to evaluate publication credibility.

Browser Extension

Injects smart citation counts directly into Google Scholar and PubMed search results.

Pricing

Free Trial

Free
  • Full access to all premium features
  • Requires credit card to activate
  • Automatic conversion to paid plan
Popular

Individual (Yearly)

$144 per year
  • Unlimited Assistant prompts
  • Unlimited Reference Checks
  • Full citation reports
  • Custom dashboards and alerts

Individual (Monthly)

$20 per month
  • All premium features
  • No long-term commitment
  • Cancel anytime

Enterprise

Custom per year
  • Institutional access
  • SSO integration
  • API access
  • Dedicated account manager

Pricing checked 6 months ago

Pricing guidance

Best plan for most users: The Individual Yearly plan is the most logical choice for active researchers, offering a 40% discount over the monthly rate.
Free plan enough? No — the free access is essentially a 'view-only' mode with 3 assistant prompts, making it insufficient for actual research tasks.
Upgrade when:
  • When you need to perform more than 3 searches
  • When you are finalizing a manuscript and need the Reference Check
  • When you want to export citation data for a literature review
Watch out for:
  • Credit card required for the free trial
  • Export limits apply to search results (usually 1,000 per CSV)
  • Full-text access depends on your institutional library subscriptions

Premium pricing that reflects its status as a specialized professional tool rather than a general consumer app.

Pros & Cons

Strengths

  • High-utility claim verification

    The ability to filter for 'contrasting' citations immediately surfaces academic disagreements that traditional search engines hide.

  • Reduced hallucination risk

    The Assistant is strictly grounded in its citation database, making it more reliable for factual academic queries than general-purpose LLMs.

  • Workflow integration

    The Zotero plugin and browser extension mean you don't have to leave your existing research environment to see citation context.

Weaknesses

  • Classification inaccuracies

    The AI occasionally mislabels 'mentioning' citations as 'supporting' or 'contrasting' based on linguistic nuances it doesn't fully grasp.

    Affects: Researchers in niche fields with complex terminology

  • Aggressive paywall

    There is no functional free tier; even the 7-day trial requires credit card entry, which is a friction point for casual users.

    Affects: Independent researchers and students on a budget

  • STEM bias

    The database and classification logic are significantly more effective for life sciences and physics than for social sciences or humanities.

    Affects: Arts and Humanities scholars

Real User Sentiment

Users generally view scite as an essential 'sanity check' tool, though they remain cautious about the AI's classification accuracy.

Users tend to like

  • The 'Supporting/Contrasting' labels save hours of reading
  • Reference Check catches embarrassing errors in drafts
  • Browser extension works perfectly on Google Scholar

Users commonly complain about

  • AI sometimes misinterprets the sentiment of a citation
  • Subscription is expensive for students
  • Credit card requirement for the trial is annoying

Recurring tradeoffs

  • Speed vs. Accuracy: It's faster than manual reading but requires a quick manual check of the citation snippet to ensure the AI got the classification right.

Happiest users

Medical and life science researchers who need to track the replication status of clinical findings.

Often frustrated

Humanities students who find the classification logic doesn't apply well to their discursive citation styles.

Use Cases

Literature Review

Quickly identifying which papers in a field are the most contested.

Manuscript Preparation

Running a Reference Check to ensure all cited papers are still in good standing.

Fact-Checking

Verifying if a scientific claim found in news media is actually supported by the cited study.

Grant Writing

Demonstrating the impact of your previous work by showing supporting citations.

Journal Selection

Using the scite Index to find journals that publish highly reproducible research.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is scite.ai free for students?

No, scite does not have a permanent free tier. It offers a 7-day free trial that requires a credit card. However, they do offer a 30-50% discount for students who can verify their status with a valid ID or university email.

How does scite compare to Elicit?

Elicit is superior for summarizing multiple papers and extracting data into tables. scite is superior for citation analysis and verifying if a specific claim has been supported or contradicted by other researchers. Most power users use both.

Can scite be trusted to classify citations correctly?

Not 100%. While the AI is highly sophisticated, it can misinterpret sarcasm, nuanced critiques, or 'mentioning' citations as 'supporting.' You should always read the provided text snippet to verify the classification.

Does scite work with Zotero?

Yes, scite has a dedicated Zotero plugin that adds columns to your library showing the number of supporting, contrasting, and mentioning citations for every paper you've saved.

What is the scite Reference Check?

It is a tool where you upload a PDF or Word doc of your research paper. scite scans your bibliography and alerts you if any of your references have been retracted, withdrawn, or have received significant contrasting evidence.

Does scite have an API?

Yes, scite provides a REST API for institutional and enterprise users to integrate smart citation data into their own platforms or for large-scale bibliometric analysis.

Why trust this page?

This evaluation combines product positioning, pricing analysis, traffic and market signals, and public user sentiment into a single decision-support page. Content is generated editorially — not copied from the vendor's website.

Funding & Company

Founded

2018

Stage

Acquired

Total Raised

$1.72M

Latest Round

Grant (May 2020)

Notable Investors

National Science Foundation National Institute on Drug Abuse National Institutes of Health

Prior to its acquisition, scite was primarily funded through competitive, non-dilutive government grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, totaling over $1.7M. In December 2023, scite was acquired by Research Solutions (NASDAQ: RSSS) for approximately $20.9M, securing its long-term financial stability and integrating it into a larger suite of tools for researchers.

Full funding report high confidence

Market Signals & Traffic

Estimated visits, global rank, geography, traffic sources, monthly visit trends, and organic search keywords (Similarweb)—on a dedicated page built for depth and search.

Estimated visits
1,053,144
Global rank
#51,403
Snapshot
Apr 2026
Traffic trend
Surging
Full market signals & traffic

Estimated monthly visits

Alternatives to scite

View all alternatives

Similar Tools

Get AI tools & workflows in your inbox

Practical picks, honest comparisons, and how teams actually use them — no spam.